Russell is fifty-nine, and he is not ready to retire. He has said so to his financial planner, to his wife, and, on the second Sunday of every month for six years, to a spreadsheet with forty-one tabs. Every tab says he can go, including the one that assumes a bad decade in the markets. One tab has never been filled in. It is the last one, and he labeled it After.
Down the corridor, a colleague with no spreadsheet at all handed in his notice in June and says he has never felt better.
This is not how preparation is supposed to work, and it matters: if the feeling decides the date, the best-prepared people will be the last to leave, and some of them will never go.
Feeling not ready to retire is common among people whose plans are sound. The feeling of readiness tends to track how many unanswered questions a person can see, and careful planning reveals more of them. Research on skill and self-assessment, on retirees’ spending, and on anxious planners points the same way: the people who prepare most often rate their readiness lowest, and the people who prepare least often feel surest.
What follows is the evidence for that, an account of what the feeling is actually measuring, and a short written test you can run tonight to find out whether the thing you are waiting for is a gap in the plan or something no plan can close.
The Colleague Who Left in June
Russell’s colleague had not modeled anything. Asked about health insurance, he said he would sort it out. Asked about the markets, he said he had never been able to predict them before and saw no reason to start. Russell found this reckless. He also found it enviable, and he did not mention that part.
It would be easy to call the colleague lucky and Russell anxious, and leave it there. A well-known piece of research suggests something more interesting is going on.
In 1999 two psychologists at Cornell, Justin Kruger and David Dunning, gave students short tests of humor, grammar and logical reasoning and then asked each of them to estimate how they had done compared with everyone else. In the logical-reasoning study, the students who scored in the bottom quarter had performed, on average, at the 12th percentile. They placed their test score at the 62nd. The students in the top quarter had scored at the 86th percentile and placed themselves at the 68th. The weakest performers overrated themselves by about fifty points. The strongest underrated themselves. The study was published as Unskilled and Unaware of It, and the authors’ explanation is the part worth keeping: the knowledge you need to do something well is largely the same knowledge you need to notice what you are getting wrong.
Nobody in those studies was retiring. They were undergraduates answering logic puzzles for course credit. But the mechanism carries over cleanly. To feel unsure about a plan, you first have to be able to see where it could fail, and seeing that takes work. The colleague felt fine partly because he had not done it.
That does not make him wrong to leave. It means his confidence was not information about his plan. Neither, as it turns out, is Russell’s lack of it.
The Money Nobody Spent
If the feeling of readiness simply tracked preparation, it would settle once the preparation was done. The clearest evidence that it does not comes from people who have already retired.
The Employee Benefit Research Institute followed retirees through the long-running Health and Retirement Study to see how quickly they actually drew down their savings. The answer, in a 2018 analysis by Sudipto Banerjee, was: slowly, and slowest of all among the people who could most afford to spend. Retirees who arrived with the most saved had spent down a median of about 12 percent of their assets after nearly two decades. About a third of all the retirees studied had more money than when they stopped working. Those with a pension, who had the most guaranteed income, had spent down the least.
These are not people with a shortfall. They are people whose plans worked, living years past the date, still behaving as if the plan might not hold. One of the most common things people type into a search box about retirement is some version of being scared to spend the money. The research says that fear is not confined to people who are short of it.
Whether that money should be spent is a separate question, and the way to settle it is the enough line, a number you set rather than a feeling you wait for. The point here is narrower. Nearly twenty years of evidence that the plan worked did not produce the feeling that it would. A spreadsheet, however good, does not switch the feeling off.
The Planner Who Expects the Worst
Russell’s bad-decade tab has a history. He built it on a night when he could not sleep, after a conversation at dinner about someone else’s portfolio. He worked through it until three in the morning. When it passed, he felt better for about a day.
It is tempting to read that as a malfunction, a man who cannot stop worrying. Some psychologists read it differently.
In 1986 Julie Norem and Nancy Cantor, then at the University of Michigan, described a strategy they called defensive pessimism: setting deliberately low expectations before a risky situation and running through what could go wrong. In their study, students identified as defensive pessimists and students identified as optimists worked on the same anagram task. The pessimists expected to do significantly worse. There was no difference in how they actually performed.
Two things follow, and both matter if you are Russell. First, a gloomy forecast from a careful person is weak evidence about the outcome; the pessimists in that study were as capable as anyone. Second, for some people the worry is how the preparation gets done. Imagining the bad decade is what produced the bad-decade tab. Asking such a person to simply feel ready is asking him to give up the method that made him ready in the first place.
“Some people who feel unready really are unready.” That is true, and it is worth saying exactly how far. A plan with no health coverage, no idea of monthly spending, or a single source of income is not finished, and the feeling is right to object. The question is how to tell that kind of unready from Russell’s kind, and the feeling alone cannot do it. Both feel the same at two in the morning.
A Spreadsheet That Grew a Tab Every Two Months
Here is the plain version of what the feeling is doing. It counts the questions you can still see open. Planning closes some of them and, as it goes, reveals others, usually faster than it closes the first ones. So the feeling of readiness falls while the plan improves.
Russell’s spreadsheet shows it in miniature. The health-cost tab raised the question of long-term care, which got its own tab. Long-term care raised the question of his mother, who is eighty-six, which got a tab with no numbers in it, only her doctor’s name. The spreadsheet grew by about one tab every two months, each one the answer to a question the tab before it had raised. Every answer was correct, and every one of them put a new question on the screen.
I thought experience would hand me answers. It changed the questions instead. The more of it I had, the less certain I sounded, and the people I came to trust most in a room were the ones who arrived with more questions than conclusions. It took me a long time to see that as a sign of competence rather than a lack of it.
Put the research and the spreadsheet together and the anomaly stops being strange. The person who feels surest is often the one who has examined least, and the person who feels least ready is often the one who has looked hardest. Readiness, felt from the inside, is mostly a report on how much you have seen.
Confidence is cheapest for the person who has looked least.
This is a narrower claim than two others on this site, and the boundary is worth drawing. The point that readiness tends to arrive after the first small steps rather than before them is made in why you are not too old to change careers. Why a working life drifts on when nothing is scheduled to end is the automatic renewal. This post is about the feeling of readiness itself: why, for careful people, it falls as the preparation rises, and why it therefore makes a poor gate for the date.
Three Versions of Not Ready
Most people who are not ready to retire, with a plan that says they are, fit one of three patterns. Each is moved by something different.
The recalculator. The numbers pass, and he runs them again. Each run turns up a new scenario worth testing, and each test passes. What moves him is the next tab: the feeling eases for a few days after a new question is answered and returns when the next one appears. This is the pattern in the spending data, carried past the retirement date.
The rehearser. She imagines the bad outcomes in vivid detail: the market fall in the first year, the illness, the boredom. The rehearsing is how she prepares, and she is good at it. What moves her is the worst case. Once she has walked through it and found a response, she can usually go; what she cannot do is skip the walk-through because someone told her she was fine.
The holder. His list is not really about money. For years I heard people in that position say they were not ready yet. Most of them were prepared. What they could not do was put down who they currently were: the title, the calendar, the role in the meeting where people waited to hear what they thought. No tab in any spreadsheet addresses that, which is why the holder can be fully funded and still frozen. If this is your version, what happens to identity after success is the longer treatment.
Russell, as it turns out, is mostly a recalculator with one holder’s question he has never written down. The test below is how he found it.
The Unready List
The test takes about twenty minutes and a sheet of paper. It works because it stops asking the feeling for a verdict and asks it for its sources instead.
First, write down every reason you are not ready to retire. One per line, in plain words, as specific as you can make them. “Money” is not a line. “I do not know what we spend in a normal month” is.
Second, mark each line with one of two letters.
P means a question planning can answer. It has a number to find, a document to read, a person to call, or a date by which you could know.
L means a question only leaving can answer. What a weekday morning will feel like in the third month. Whether you will miss the work or only the people. Who you will be when nobody needs a decision from you by Friday.
Third, look only at the P lines. For each, write the date by which it will be answered, or a tick if it already has been.
The reading is simple. If every P line is ticked or dated, the plan is finished, or will be by the last date on the page. What the feeling is still reporting are the L lines, and no amount of further planning will move them, because planning is not what answers them. If some P lines have no date, the feeling is partly right, and those lines are the work. If the P lines are mostly about the number itself, the freedom number is where to start.
Russell’s first attempt went wrong in an instructive way. He wrote eleven lines and marked every one of them P, then started a new tab for each. Two of those tabs were “How will I structure my weeks?” and “Will I be bored?” He spent a Sunday building a weekly schedule for a life he had not yet lived, and the feeling did not move at all.
On the second attempt he marked those two L. Of the nine that were left, seven were already answered. One, the cost of his mother’s care if it changed, had a date: her next assessment, in November. The last P line, whether his wife would cut back her own hours, had no date, because it was not his question to settle alone, and he has not asked it yet.
The two L lines, he noticed, were exactly what belonged on the tab he had labeled After.
A Trial Run for the Second Column
If your list comes back with a short P column and a long L column, it is tempting to conclude you should simply go. Sometimes that is right. But L questions can be sampled before the date, even if they cannot be planned.
Sampling means putting a small, real piece of the after-life into the present and paying attention to how it feels from the inside. Two weeks of unpaid leave spent at home, not on a trip. A weekday morning blocked out, every week for a month, with nothing scheduled in it. Designing your ideal ordinary day gives that morning a shape. If the L lines are about work rather than rest, running a small second thing beside the job, the way the Overlap Method describes, answers them faster than any spreadsheet can.
None of this closes the L column. It shortens it, and it turns “I don’t know what it will feel like” into “I know what three Wednesdays felt like,” which is a different kind of uncertainty and a much easier one to carry.
“If I go and it is wrong, I cannot undo it.” That is partly true, and it is worth being exact about which part. Leaving a particular job is hard to reverse. Almost everything after the date stays open: people take on part-time work, consult, volunteer, move, and change their minds about all of it, which is one more reason the L lines cannot be finished in advance. Retirement is not the goal makes the longer case that the date was never the point.
What the list does give you is a way to stop waiting for a feeling that, on the evidence, careful people rarely get. The P column tells you whether the plan is done; the L column is a list of what only the leaving will teach.
Questions From the Second Column
How do you know when you’re ready to retire?
You are ready when the questions planning can answer have been answered or dated: what you spend, where the income comes from, how health costs are covered, and what happens in a bad market. The remaining doubts usually concern what daily life will feel like, and those cannot be settled in advance. Writing the two kinds of question in separate columns makes the difference visible.
Is it normal to be afraid to retire?
Yes. Fear about retiring is common even among people with sound finances, and it often has more to do with routine, purpose and identity than with money. Research on self-assessment suggests that people who have looked hardest at a decision often feel least sure of it, so the fear by itself says little about whether the plan is ready.
Why are people scared to retire even with enough money?
A plan answers financial questions, and most of the fear sits in questions a plan cannot answer, such as how the days will be spent and what replaces the role work provided. Careful planners also see more ways a plan could fail, which keeps the feeling of risk high even after each risk has been covered.
Why am I scared to spend my retirement savings?
You are in large company. An analysis of Health and Retirement Study data by the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that many retirees, especially those with the most saved or with a pension, spend down their assets slowly, and about a third end up with more than they started with. A deliberate spending rule, set with a fee-only fiduciary planner if you use one, tends to work better than waiting for the fear to fade.
What are the signs you are not ready to retire?
The useful signs are concrete: you do not know your monthly spending, you have no plan for health coverage before Medicare eligibility, your income depends on a single source, or a reasonable bad-market scenario breaks the plan. A general feeling of not being ready, without any of these, is a much weaker sign and is common in people whose plans are complete.
What if I’m 65 and not ready to retire?
Then you have options other than a single date. Many people reduce hours, consult or change roles before stopping completely, which lets them test what life after full-time work feels like. If the reasons are financial, they belong on a list with dates attached; if they concern how you will spend your time, a trial period answers them better than more planning.
This is the eighth stop on The Number Path: financial freedom after 40 → the freedom number → Coast FIRE after 40 → how much money is enough → retirement is not the goal → afraid to leave a good job → a career backup plan after 40 → you are here.
Get The Midlife Reinvention Blueprint
The free 20-page workbook for redesigning your career, money, and purpose after 40 — the four-pillar framework, a personal audit, the five defining questions, and a 90-day roadmap, including the worksheets for your freedom and coast numbers.
Why This Painting
What is he writing? The museum does not say. Jan Ekels the Younger signed and dated the panel in 1784, and the Rijksmuseum’s title for it is plain: A Man Writing at his Desk. Behind him hang a landscape and a portrait of another man, and he looks at neither. The page has his whole attention, and the picture does not show him finishing it.
The Tab Called After
Russell has not filled in the last tab. He has stopped trying to, because the list showed him what kind of question was waiting there, and that a spreadsheet was the wrong place to answer it.
He has done something smaller instead. He has put the nine remaining lines on one sheet of paper, with a date beside every P line but one, and he has booked two weeks of leave in the spring that he intends to spend at home on ordinary weekdays.
The evidence on this is consistent enough to act on. The people who prepare most carefully often feel the least ready, because preparing is how they come to see everything that might go wrong. The feeling is real, and it is honest about what it is counting. It is just not counting the plan.
Confidence is cheapest for the person who has looked least.
Read next → Feeling useless after retirement: what you actually miss
Most of the frameworks here come with a scored instrument: a worksheet you fill in rather than read. Reading one is quick. Filling one in is the part that changes something.
Open the pack →
